<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sherlock Holmes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jordansummers.com/2009/12/27/sherlock-holmes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jordansummers.com/2009/12/27/sherlock-holmes/</link>
	<description>Romance Writer &#38; Urban Fantasy Novelist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 06:44:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Summers</title>
		<link>http://www.jordansummers.com/2009/12/27/sherlock-holmes/comment-page-1/#comment-17683</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Summers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 08:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jordansummers.com/?p=1718#comment-17683</guid>
		<description>Sasha, Yeah, Robert was in really great shape. The chemistry with Jude was fabulous. Here&#039;s hoping the script of the next one is a lot better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sasha, Yeah, Robert was in really great shape. The chemistry with Jude was fabulous. Here&#8217;s hoping the script of the next one is a lot better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sasha</title>
		<link>http://www.jordansummers.com/2009/12/27/sherlock-holmes/comment-page-1/#comment-17680</link>
		<dc:creator>Sasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jordansummers.com/?p=1718#comment-17680</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed it.  Loved the newly ripped RDJ, and the chemistry between him and Jude law was great. I think the visual aspects definitely outdid the script, and hopefully if/when they do a sequel, the story will be a bit stronger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed it.  Loved the newly ripped RDJ, and the chemistry between him and Jude law was great. I think the visual aspects definitely outdid the script, and hopefully if/when they do a sequel, the story will be a bit stronger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Summers</title>
		<link>http://www.jordansummers.com/2009/12/27/sherlock-holmes/comment-page-1/#comment-17679</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Summers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jordansummers.com/?p=1718#comment-17679</guid>
		<description>Delilah, It was fun enough. And Downey is Downey. He has a lot of witty dialogue or ad libs depending on what they went with. *g*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delilah, It was fun enough. And Downey is Downey. He has a lot of witty dialogue or ad libs depending on what they went with. *g*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Summers</title>
		<link>http://www.jordansummers.com/2009/12/27/sherlock-holmes/comment-page-1/#comment-17678</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Summers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jordansummers.com/?p=1718#comment-17678</guid>
		<description>Bernard, I went in not expecting it to be like the books. I figured it was a sort of &#039;reinventing&#039; of Sherlock Holmes. It&#039;s definitely that. I was just hoping for a sharper story and better pacing. I thought the characters were interesting and fun. It&#039;s entertaining enough, but it could&#039;ve been much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bernard, I went in not expecting it to be like the books. I figured it was a sort of &#8216;reinventing&#8217; of Sherlock Holmes. It&#8217;s definitely that. I was just hoping for a sharper story and better pacing. I thought the characters were interesting and fun. It&#8217;s entertaining enough, but it could&#8217;ve been much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Summers</title>
		<link>http://www.jordansummers.com/2009/12/27/sherlock-holmes/comment-page-1/#comment-17677</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Summers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jordansummers.com/?p=1718#comment-17677</guid>
		<description>Charli, It&#039;s very steampunk visually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charli, It&#8217;s very steampunk visually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Summers</title>
		<link>http://www.jordansummers.com/2009/12/27/sherlock-holmes/comment-page-1/#comment-17676</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Summers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jordansummers.com/?p=1718#comment-17676</guid>
		<description>Toni, The script was definitely a little all over the place. I agree that it didn&#039;t live up to the previews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toni, The script was definitely a little all over the place. I agree that it didn&#8217;t live up to the previews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delilah Devlin</title>
		<link>http://www.jordansummers.com/2009/12/27/sherlock-holmes/comment-page-1/#comment-17675</link>
		<dc:creator>Delilah Devlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jordansummers.com/?p=1718#comment-17675</guid>
		<description>From the trailers, I knew the movie wouldn&#039;t be a traditional Holmes film. Still, it looks like fun. Anytime there are bombs exploding, I&#039;m there. And I&#039;ll watch anything starring Robert Downey, Jr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the trailers, I knew the movie wouldn&#8217;t be a traditional Holmes film. Still, it looks like fun. Anytime there are bombs exploding, I&#8217;m there. And I&#8217;ll watch anything starring Robert Downey, Jr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BernardL</title>
		<link>http://www.jordansummers.com/2009/12/27/sherlock-holmes/comment-page-1/#comment-17674</link>
		<dc:creator>BernardL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jordansummers.com/?p=1718#comment-17674</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the review. I&#039;ve read some very differing reviews which seem to fall in line with your take about not expecting a fundamentalist approach to Holmes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review. I&#8217;ve read some very differing reviews which seem to fall in line with your take about not expecting a fundamentalist approach to Holmes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charli</title>
		<link>http://www.jordansummers.com/2009/12/27/sherlock-holmes/comment-page-1/#comment-17672</link>
		<dc:creator>Charli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jordansummers.com/?p=1718#comment-17672</guid>
		<description>I love the look of the Holmes movie, and I hope they do more! That&#039;s the one I&#039;m really looking forward to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the look of the Holmes movie, and I hope they do more! That&#8217;s the one I&#8217;m really looking forward to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toni</title>
		<link>http://www.jordansummers.com/2009/12/27/sherlock-holmes/comment-page-1/#comment-17670</link>
		<dc:creator>Toni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 04:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jordansummers.com/?p=1718#comment-17670</guid>
		<description>I liked the interaction between Holmes and Watson (definite bromance chemistry there) and the visual (steampunky) quality of the film.  Still, I think the movie was a failure (too bad because I was really looking forward to it).  I didn&#039;t particularly care for the script.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the interaction between Holmes and Watson (definite bromance chemistry there) and the visual (steampunky) quality of the film.  Still, I think the movie was a failure (too bad because I was really looking forward to it).  I didn&#8217;t particularly care for the script.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
